{"id":57,"date":"2017-04-26T20:08:06","date_gmt":"2017-04-27T00:08:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.bowdoin.edu\/education-2272-spring-2017-ghandler\/?page_id=57"},"modified":"2017-05-15T08:48:51","modified_gmt":"2017-05-15T12:48:51","slug":"practitioner-oriented-articles","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/courses.bowdoin.edu\/education-2272-spring-2017-ghandler\/practitioner-oriented-articles\/","title":{"rendered":"Practitioner-oriented Articles"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In their practitioner-oriented article, entitled \u201cThe school to prison pipeline, explained\u201d published in 2015, Libby Nelson and Dara Lind address \u201chow the current state of school discipline developed and why some districts and federal officials are working to change the status quo.&#8221;<sup>6<\/sup> Their piece draws on many statistics to explain the current state of public schools in regards to discipline and in relation to the school-to-prison pipeline.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In their practitioner oriented article published in 2014, entitled \u201cFrom Classmates to Inmates: An Integrated Approach to Break the School-to-Prison Pipeline,\u201d Elizabeth D. Cramer, Liana Gonzalez, and Cynthia Pellegrini-Lafont explore different theoretical frameworks for addressing school dropout.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">These articles pair well together, with the former setting the stage that the latter intends to address.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Nelson and Lind\u2019s article begins by stating: <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201cThe reason the difference between juvenile detention and school discipline is so surprising &#8212; and the reason school discipline is seen as a growing concern &#8212; is that the two are connected, leading civil-rights advocates to talk about a \u2018school-to-prison pipeline.\u2019\u201d<sup>6<\/sup> Immediately connecting school discipline with civil-rights, Nelson and Lind assert that the issue of school discipline goes far beyond just the school.<\/span>They continue with six statements about the school-to-prison pipeline and why it developed:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201c[1] concerns about crime led schools to adopt \u2018zero tolerance policies,\u2019 [2] schools have outsourced discipline to juvenile courts and officers in schools, [3] black students are more likely to be disciplined, [4] even when schools aren\u2019t deliberately sending children into the juvenile justice system, disciplining them makes it more likely they\u2019ll end up there, [5] the education department is pushing schools to change their discipline policies, and [6] some school districts are taking the matters into their own hands.&#8221;<sup>6<\/sup><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Nelson and Lind maintain a neutral voice allowing others\u2019 research and data speak for them and simply providing a framework.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cramer, Gonzalez, and Pellegrini-Lafont, however, offer an analytical and critical voice, drawing on the work of other scholars to propose a framework to address the issues with school discipline. They write, \u201cThe proposed Integrated Learning Model seeks to bridge the work of sociocultural theorists&#8230;in order to form a clear framework that can serve to guide classroom climate and structure, while still leaving room for flexibility of implementation.&#8221;<sup>4<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">They write that there are similarities between the issues associated with dropout and the school-to-prison pipeline and the issues associated with dropout and special education. In this way, there can be overlap in ways to address these problems. They continue, \u201cThe focus is on finding ways to support the student to be successful within the classroom, rather than turning toward exclusionary practices, such as suspensions, expulsions, or referrals to segregated settings.&#8221;<sup>4<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Nelson and Lind explain that \u201cmany discretionary suspensions and arrests are for tough-to-define offenses, like \u2018insubordination\u2019 or \u2018willful defiance,\u2019 which can just mean a student has challenged the authority of a teacher or school administrator.&#8221;<sup>6<\/sup> Here, there is a systemic issues that relies on unclear and undefined policies, thus leaving freedom for bias.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cramer, Gonzalez, and Pellegrini-Lafont add: \u201cThe nexus between dropout and prison is cultural marginalization&#8230;students are more likely to drop out when they do not feel they are part of the general culture of the school.&#8221;<sup>4<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Both articles suggest a focus on individual student success rather than individual student failure. Nelson and Lind\u2019s article explains the current state, as of 2015, of school discipline and incarceration while Cramer, Gonzelez, and Pelligrini-Lafont provides theories to apply in the classroom.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In their practitioner-oriented article, entitled \u201cThe school to prison pipeline, explained\u201d published in 2015, Libby Nelson and Dara Lind address \u201chow the current state of school discipline developed and why some districts and federal officials are working to change the status quo.&#8221;6 Their piece draws on many statistics to explain the current state of public [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":248,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-57","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.bowdoin.edu\/education-2272-spring-2017-ghandler\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/57","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.bowdoin.edu\/education-2272-spring-2017-ghandler\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.bowdoin.edu\/education-2272-spring-2017-ghandler\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.bowdoin.edu\/education-2272-spring-2017-ghandler\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/248"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/courses.bowdoin.edu\/education-2272-spring-2017-ghandler\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/courses.bowdoin.edu\/education-2272-spring-2017-ghandler\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/57\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/courses.bowdoin.edu\/education-2272-spring-2017-ghandler\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}