As Kimmel says, the 😣😣😣↗↗↗ often views college campuses and classes as being dominated by the toxic religion of 👫👫👫. They specifically focus on how 👫👫👫 in classes and social settings “further marginalizes” men. With this 😣😣😣 ↗↗↗ competing with 👫👫👫, how do these ideas impact 👫👫👫 today?
Do they force 👫👫👫to justify it’s existence/validity and distract from it’s goals? Does this ↗↗↗ push 👫👫👫 to play into the politics of respectability and neglect the major issues at hand?
Or do they make 👫👫👫 seem more important and obviously necessary to people who might not otherwise feel that way? Also, do ↗↗↗ like the pro-feminist ↗↗↗ push👫👫👫 to think more about important issues (like the impact of the gender binary on cis-men or trans people)?
Male victim = 😣😣😣
Feminism = 👫👫👫
Movement = ↗↗↗
Several weeks ago, we talked about how Cooper thinks about 👔🚶👮 in the 🖥🖥. She mentions how many of the 🖥🖥 men interviewed were victimized by 🎅🎅🎅 earlier in their lives. In my question, I thought about the relationship between their 👔🚶👮 and 🎅🎅🎅. In class, we talked about the way those 🖥🖥 👔🚶👮, like those practiced by Mark Zuckerberg, are different from and similar to 🎅🎅🎅. We talked about the limited power that these men give to their wives, but the ways in which they are widely praised for their pursuit of 👫👫👫. In this way, the low standards that women and society at large creates for 👔🚶👮 leads to the creation of a system where men are praised heavily for their pursuit of 👫👫👫, even if they don’t show a strong commitment to the cause. With this in mind, are these 🖥🖥 👔🚶👮 more of a step towards 👫👫👫, or a threat to it?
Tech industry = 🖥🖥
Hegemonic masculinity = 🎅🎅🎅
Gender equality = 👫👫👫