A difficult discussion yesterday. But it does force us to 🤔 about how deceptively complicated inclusive and hybrid masculinities are.
How do 👨👨 challenge 🏿, 👩, & 🌈 oppression if their participation also reproduces hegemonic masculinity? Must masculinity always depend on 💪?
It seems we want 👨👨to participate by taking 💺💺💺and 🤐. That seems to undermine the cause of = . The point of 👊🏿 inequality is to show
that our struggles are tied together. If that is true, then 👨👨have a place in the movement 2. We should not 🤐 them right out, or try to
shut them down. That only shows how complicit we are in perpetuating the same hegemonic masculinities we want to ultimately dismantle. 😮🤓
🤔 = think 🏿 = racial 🌈 = sexual 💪 = power 💺💺💺 = several seats 🤐= stay silent/silence 👊🏿 = challenging 🤓 = Professor Greene’s trademark emoji (😉)