A difficult discussion yesterday. But it does force us to ? about how deceptively complicated inclusive and hybrid masculinities are.
How do ?? challenge ?, ?, & ? oppression if their participation also reproduces hegemonic masculinity? Must masculinity always depend on ??
It seems we want ??to participate by taking ???and ?. That seems to undermine the cause of = . The point of ?? inequality is to show
that our struggles are tied together. If that is true, then ??have a place in the movement 2. We should not ? them right out, or try to
shut them down. That only shows how complicit we are in perpetuating the same hegemonic masculinities we want to ultimately dismantle. ??
? = think ? = racial ? = sexual ? = power ??? = several seats ?= stay silent/silence ?? = challenging ? = Professor Greene’s trademark emoji (?)