In the past couple of decades, anti-establishment and radical movements have gained popularity throughout the world. Yellow vesters, Brexiters, Arab Spring protestors, and MAGA supporters are just some of the many social movements that embody distrust towards the government. Unlike mainstream parties or groups, these movements often approach change as political outsiders, appealing to the population with populist reforms that radically restructure institutions. They offer the oppressed and marginalized, those who are usually ignored in politics, a chance to voice their dissatisfaction. This discontent, however, can manifest divergently. Although sociologist George Simmel might not have imagined how polarized a society could become, he would be right however, to theorize that commonalities could exist between two deeply divided sides. Examining the radical-right and left movements reveals that while they hold vastly different ideological views, both sides share intolerance of other groups, frustration towards conventional politics, and similar mobilization tactics.
Radical-right and left movements both hold absolutist ideals, which make them intolerant towards outsiders. These groups tend to “share the same high degree of moral outrage and anger,” albeit at different targets, making members “True Believers… with no doubts whatsoever” (Domhoff). Essentially, radicals mark anyone who does not support their respective causes as enemies to their righteous cause. Although right-wing groups have often been painted as intolerant, research has shown that this intolerance is not just confined to a single political spectrum as any “political extremism reliably predicts intolerance” (van Prooijen and Krouwel 2019:162). Unsurprisingly, these biased attitudes, although to a less degree, were also found among moderate liberals and conservatives (Hutson 2017). However, radicals’ absolutist ideals extend beyond the bias of moderates, pitting extremists against the center. Moderate Democrats have condemned Antifa for their violence, and Black Lives Matter activists have continually pushed against the mainstream party (Melchior 2020; Barron-Lopez and Otterbein 2020). While most Republican circles have been more reluctant to condemn far-right activities, right-wing extremists have shown their willingness to clash against Republicans, sending death threats to election officials who do not stay “true” to their cause (Fowler 2020).
Radical groups also share similar rallying tactics, using online platforms to mobilize and recruit. Both left- and right-wing extremists rely heavily on social media for their activities. The Alt-Right uses social media for coordination and growth and pushes their ideology into the mainstream through semi-organized Twitter propaganda campaigns (“Alt-Right”). Companies have attempted to deplatform Alt-Right users, but the movement remains a strong presence online with their memes and hashtags widely circulated. Likewise, as Antifa is a decentralized movement, social media is essential for mobilization since chapters “organize mostly on message boards such as Reddit and over social networks like Twitter and Facebook” (Cammeron). The movement has a “large following on social media, where it shares news articles and sometimes seeks to dox or reveal the identities and personal information of figures on the right” (NYT). However, while both groups engage in online activities to mobilize and recruit members, they have also shown willingness to engage in physically aggressive tactics.
Eschewing traditional means of protest and gaining power, radicals have engaged in violent activities to express their ideals. Overtly aggressive tactics are not exclusive to radical-left movements or far-right movements. Clashing with far-right rallies, Antifa members have been shown to engage in the “destruction of property and sometimes physical violence,” (Cammeron). Like Antifa, right-wing groups such as the Alt-Right and the Proud Boys have demonstrated willingness to engage in violent activities, physically assaulting Black Lives Matter protestors and vandalizing property (Jackman et al. 2020). However, the two movements seem to split on their levels of violence. A CSIS report found that the far-right groups were behind the most U.S. terrorist attacks and have been involved in attacks and plots three times more often than left-wing radicals (Jones et al.). Nonetheless, both group’s wiliness to engage in militant activities, both online and offline, distinguishes them from traditional organizations and demonstrates their common anti-establishment fervor.
Unsurprisingly, radical movements tend to dislike and distrust mainstream parties. Antifa, arguably the most prominent radical-left movement in the U.S, is primarily composed of members who describe “themselves as socialists, anarchists, communists or anti-capitalists,” essentially the far-left fringes of the political spectrum (“What Is Antifa?”). Antifa cares little for the establishment, holding “no allegiance to liberal democracy, which they believe has failed the marginalized communities they’re defending” (Illing). Far-right movements have also rejected the mainstream establishment as members feel that the government has failed to protect their rights. This victim mentality and distrust show through the Alt-Right’s “core belief is that ‘white identity’ is under attack by multicultural forces using ‘political correctness’ and ‘social justice’” (“Alt-Right”). Breaking with mainstream conservative ideology, the Alt-Right denounces the right-wing establishment as useless and calls for “anarcho-capitalism, which advocates individual sovereignty and open markets in place of an organized state” (“Alt-Right”). Although motivated by different ideologies, left and right radicals indicate that the current establishment has failed them.
While both the radical left and right movements share similar mobilization tactics, absolutist ideals, and anti-establishment sentiments, they have polar raison d’etre. Left-wing movements such as Antifa “oppose all forms of racism and sexism, and strongly oppose what they see as the nationalist, anti-immigration and anti-Muslim policies,” whereas the right-wing movements embrace those exact values (Cammeron). These opposing views often result in violent clashes when the two movements meet. Interestingly, these antitheses voice disdain for the establishment, but what each movement visualizes as the “establishment” seems quite different.
Works Cited:
Al Jazeera. “What Is Antifa?” U.S. & Canada | Al Jazeera, Al Jazeera Media Network, 2 June 2020, www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/06/02/what-is-antifa/.
“Alt Right: A Primer on the New White Supremacy.” Anti-Defamation League, Anti-Defamation League, www.adl.org/resources/backgrounders/alt-right-a-primer-on-the-new-white-supremacy.
“Alt-Right.” Southern Poverty Law Center, The Southern Poverty Law Center, www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/ideology/alt-right.
Barron-Lopez, Laura and Otterbein, Holly. “Black Lives Matter activists strike back at Dems slamming ‘defund the police,’” Politico, 19 November, 2020, https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/19/blm-defund-police-democrats-437940
Cammeron, Brenna. “Antifa: Left-Wing Militants on the Rise.” BBC News, BBC, 14 Aug. 2017, www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40930831.
Domhoff, G. William. “The Left and the Right in Thinking, Personality, and Politics.” October, 2013, https://whorulesamerica.ucsc.edu/change/left_and_right.html
Fowler, Stephen. “’Someone’s Going to Get Killed’: Ga. Official Blasts GOP Silence on Election Threats.” NPR, 1 Dec. 2020, https://www.npr.org/sections/biden-transition-updates/2020/12/01/940961602/someones-going-to-get-killed-ga-official-blasts-gop-silence-on-election-threats
Graves, Howard, and Cassie Miller. “When the ‘Alt-Right’ Hit the Streets: Far-Right Political Rallies in the Trump Era.” Southern Poverty Law Center, The Southern Poverty Law Center, 10 Aug. 2020, www.splcenter.org/20200810/when-alt-right-hit-streets-far-right-political-rallies-trump-era.
Hutson, Matthew. “Why Liberals Aren’t as Tolerant as They Think.” Politico, 9 May 2017, https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/05/09/why-liberals-arent-as-tolerant-as-they-think-215114
Illing, Sean. “‘They Have No Allegiance to Liberal Democracy’: An Expert on Antifa Explains the Group.” Vox, Vox Media, 25 Aug. 2017, www.vox.com/2017/8/25/16189064/protests-george-floyd-antifa-president-trump.
Jackman, Tom, Duggan, Paul, Marimow, Ann E. and Hsu, Spencer S. “Proud Boys sparked clashes during pro-Trump rally, D.C. officials say.” Washington Post, 15 December, 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/trump-rally-violence-proud-boys/2020/12/14/bf2f5826-3e26-11eb-8bc0-ae155bee4aff_story.html
Jones, Seth G, et al. “The Escalating Terrorism Problem in the United States.” Center for Strategic and International Studies, Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2 Dec. 2020, www.csis.org/analysis/escalating-terrorism-problem-united-states.
van Prooijen, J.-W., & Krouwel, A. P. M. (2019). Psychological Features of Extreme Political Ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29 January 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418817755