{"id":191,"date":"2016-04-10T15:45:24","date_gmt":"2016-04-10T19:45:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/courses.bowdoin.edu\/theater-1504-spring-2016\/?p=191"},"modified":"2016-04-10T15:45:31","modified_gmt":"2016-04-10T19:45:31","slug":"the-cost-of-ignorance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/courses.bowdoin.edu\/theater-1504-spring-2016\/theater\/the-cost-of-ignorance\/","title":{"rendered":"The Cost of Ignorance"},"content":{"rendered":"

Georg B\u00fcchner’s Woyzeck <\/em>takes us through the tragic tale of Franz Woyzeck, a poor military barber. Although the story itself is fiction, the play\u2019s version Woyzeck is based on the historical Johann Christian Woyzeck (1780-1824), a veteran who \u201ckilled his lover by stabbing her seven times with a broken sword blade\u201d (Woyzeck, p. 133). Although commonly interpreted as the story of a man (i.e. Franz Woyzeck) who becomes the victim of social and economic forces, I argue B\u00fcchner\u2019s \u201cmodern\u201d drama should be equally characterized as a play that calls attention to the dangers of mental illness, specifically Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). PTSD is defined as a \u201cpsychiatric disorder that can occur following the experience or witnessing of a life-threatening events such as military combat, natural disasters, terrorist incidents, serious accidents, or physical or sexual assault in adult or childhood\u201d (PTSD, Nebraska Department of Veterans’ Affairs). Although the treatment of veterans has improved since B\u00fcchner\u2019s time, war survivors still do not receive the treatment they deserve. My family has a lengthy history of military service and mental illness from conflict is something I have always felt passionate about. Although my father, a Vietnam veteran, is mentally healthy, my uncle who is also a Vietnam veteran has struggled with PTSD since his early twenties. Another uncle of mine recently returned from the conflict in Afghanistan and Iraq, though thankfully without mental distress. I believe B\u00fcchner utilizes a socially oppressed military veteran as his protagonist in order to critique the treatment of veterans and\/or other mentally unstable patients during his time.<\/p>\n

Woyzeck <\/em>however, is also undoubtedly a damning social critique that does not shy away from its naturalistic roots. As we have learned in our readings and in class, naturalist plays are defined by their bland and ordinary settings, and most often pit the story\u2019s protagonist against external forces determined by hereditary, social, and\/or economic factors (Zarrilli, p. 273, Cash). As previously mentioned, in reading the play it becomes clears that Franz Woyzeck most definitely suffers from the latter two factors. Signs of mental illness however, are littered throughout the play. Woyzeck believes someone continually follows him and that something, or someone, is \u201cout there,\u201d even though other characters have not the slightest idea of who or what he is referring to (Woyzeck, p. 138). Marie states Franz is \u201cout of his mind\u201d when he attempts to personify her \u201csin so fat and wide\u201d and in one of the optional scenes, the Doctor also tells Woyzeck that he is mad and must be taken to the \u201cinsane asylum\u201d (Woyzeck, p. 143, 166-167). Woyzeck himself states that he has hallucinations and has \u201cheard a terrible voice talking to [him]\u201d (Woyzeck, p. 144-145). Furthermore, the Doctor continually toys with and uses Woyzeck as a test subject for his experiments. In my reading of the play, the Doctor became analogous to those medical \u201cpractioners\u201d who perceive mental illness as an opportunity to be taken advantage of. Rather than running tests to help placate Woyzeck\u2019s (mental) illnesses, the Doctor instead runs strange tests on the barbers such as only feeding him peas. It is no secret that many veterans suffering from PTSD and other mentally ill patients often do not receive proper care. I believe B\u00fcchner\u2019s decision to utilize the Doctor as a figure that acts contrary to his intended purpose (i.e. he should heal not harm) is representative of past and modern day ignorance, or naivety, of mental illness.<\/p>\n

Marie\u2019s infidelity and her eventual murder however, serve as breaking points for Woyzeck. His wife\u2019s sinful actions break his heart, while Woyzeck\u2019s eruption of violence shatters his mind. Many veterans I have spoken with, including those in my family, have consistently told me their loved ones is the only thing that keeps them alive and happy. For Marie to sleep with another man and essentially destroy one of the few things Woyzeck has left to hold on to, his mental well being \u2013 fragile as it already was \u2013 easily breaks alongside his heart. The violent murder Woyzeck commits I argue depicts our protagonist cracking not only under social and economic pressure, but also mental pressure. After murdering his wife, Woyzeck then seems to adopt a state of mind that justifies his violent actions. At the inn he states, \u201cThat\u2019s the way it is: the devil takes on and lets the other go\u201d (Woyzeck, p. 153). Later, after returning to his wife\u2019s body Woyzeck states, \u201cThey made you black, black! Now I\u2019ve made you white\u201d (Woyzeck, p. 154). Though it is impossible to determine whether or not the real life Woyzeck shared similar mental issues, I believe his theatrical counterpart serves as a way for B\u00fcchner to raise awareness to the issue of mental illness. Regardless of the translation, Woyzeck\u2019s story represents the harmful effects of mental illness and the tragic costs of society\u2019s failure to recognize and help aid those with related sicknesses.<\/p>\n

Questions: Have\u00a0there been any contemporary showings\u00a0of Woyzeck <\/em>that showcase mental illness as something the play is attempting to draw attention to? My reading of the play may be entirely misguided, however is there a reason in particular B\u00fcchner chose a war veteran for his protagonist, rather than selecting one of the other countless men who have murdered their wife? Finally, the Grandmother\u2019s \u201cfairy tale\u201d (p. 151) seems a little out of place. Does the tale have a specific, known significance to it or did B\u00fcchner ever comment as to why it was put in the play in the first place?<\/p>\n

Additional Sources:<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/stage\/2002\/sep\/28\/theatre.artsfeatures<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.ptsd.ne.gov\/what-is-ptsd.html<\/p>\n

25 Intriguing Techniques for Realism and Naturalism in Theatre<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n