The Xenomorph: Hive Minded Aliens in James Cameron’s “Aliens”

After Ridley Scott’s smash hit sci-fi success in “Alien”, the natural question was obviously “what next?”. This was answered in the form of “Aliens”, a sequel which built upon the legacy of the first movie, adding more of everything, more guns, more threat, and importantly, more xenomorphs!

Whilst “Alien” focused on the threat posed by a singular xenomorph, “Aliens” expanded upon this by introducing the threat posed by a whole colony of these creatures. After the events of the first film Ripley (Sigourney Weaver) drifts in space for the next 57 years until being found. Due to this she is unable to warn humanity of the threat posed by the xenomorphs and in the meantime the Weyland Yutani company has sent colonists to the Alien’s home world. The film then follows Ripley’s attempts to destroy the xenomorphs which have taken over this colony.

Most interestingly for the purpose of this blog post, the film allows us to see how the xenomorphs organize themselves when in large numbers. The humans discover that the xenomorphs have gathered themselves around a single “queen”. The individual xenomorphs then act as “drones” for the queen, capturing live humans to be brought back for impregnation with the alien parasite to further reproduction.

For me it is therefore interesting to see how Cameron’s vision for the xenomorph, an alien designed to be as terrifying as possible, places it within a hive mind. It is easy to see why, the xenomorphs now become ruthless killing machines with no individuality. They cannot be reasoned with, their life becomes a vicious cycle of mindless violence with a singular purpose, to propagate their species.

What makes the xenomorph hive mind even more terrifying in my opinion is their utter disregard for humans. In a complete reversal of the “natural” established order (humans>animals), humans become little more than chattel. This makes the xenomorphs even more terrifying, we humans like to think that we will meet aliens who are at least our equals, but to the xenomorph we are utterly beneath their concern aside from our ability as an incubator.

Close Reading Paper on “Rainy Day Revolution No. 39”

 

In “Rainy Day Revolution No. 39” the Italian science fiction writer Luigi Cozzi imagines a dystopic future in which population controls and party politics have been taken to hideous extremes. Cozzi’s story follows Lester Aharddaysnight as he braves a journey on the underground, a trip fraught with danger at every turn. On the train Lester meets and befriends another man, Judas Imabeliever. When he reaches his stop, Lester prepares to jump off the train where the story ends ambiguously as to whether he is survives this jump or not. One of the major thematic conflicts in this story is the struggle of the individual against the bureaucratic system they inhabit. One way this is manifested in “Rainy Day Revolution” is through the tensions within the narrative over the men and masculinity. In this story Cozzi presents a society pervaded with individual men who have been robbed of their perceived masculinity by the mechanistic bureaucracy of the Parties. In this paper I will argue that Cozzi presents the struggle between individual and oppressive society through the theme of masculinity and lost masculinity in relation to control over female bodies. In order to argue this I will look at three main ways that Cozzi accomplishes this; firstly, through the advertisements at the beginning of the story and Lester’s reaction towards them;  and secondly through his description of  the sacrifice of a female victim to the underground train by robotic workers.

Cozzi brings the theme of sex and especially the sexual power of women into this story immediately in a number of ways. Firstly, he chooses to preface the story with a quotation which discusses humanity’s desire to conquer new worlds. Interestingly for our purpose, the quotation describes the planet as an “oyster”, a popular symbol for the reproductive power of the female womb (Cozzi, 197). The story then begins properly with a string of advertisements which directly appeal to masculinity, and especially masculinity tied into male sexual activity. The fact that these adverts are described as essentially, “gigantic women continuously stripping”, overtly indicates their relationship with masculinity through male sexuality, and moreover, male sexuality as indicated by the control over female bodies and sexuality.  An advert for cigarettes appeals to cigarettes as a masculinizing experience, claiming that it “wakes your sleeping sex” (Cozzi, 197). The name of the cigarette brand, “Sexy-x” also points to the theme of masculinity as the extra “x” links itself to the “y” ending of sexy. This XY pairing, identical to the sex-determining chromosome pairing for men, further links this advertisement to a sense of masculinity. The masculinity promoted by these advertisements is explicitly linked to sexual domination and control over women by the third advertisement, the product in which promises, “to let you own her without troubles” (Cozzi, 197). However, Cozzi subtlety suggests a pervasive anxiety over a missing masculinity through these advertisements, the fact that these advertisements exist and call for re-masculinization, “wakes your sleeping sex”, suggests a level of anxiety surrounding male virility (Cozzi, 197).

In addition to the advertisements themselves, Cozzi’s description of Lester’s reaction to them further highlights the conflicts over masculinity that take place within this story. Cozzi writes, “It was hard to resist the fascination of those gigantic women continuously stripping” (Cozzi, 197). Here I would argue that Cozzi uses a moment of free indirect discourse, rare within this story, to have Lester’s perspective invade the normally objective narrative voice. Through this technique Cozzi highlights Lester’s desire to stare at the, essentially pornographic, advertisements. In doing so Cozzi highlights Lester as a stereotypically masculine figure who seeks to possess the female bodies on these advertisements through voyeurism. Cozzi continues however, “as soon as they [the women] were entirely naked, their voluptuous bodies were covered with these flashing letters” (Cozzi, 197). Thus, the advertisements, as described by Cozzi, essentially act as a sexual inhibitor for Lester, bringing him to the brink of a sexual climax, here imagined as the moment where these women are totally naked, and then occluding the final image. In this way the advertisements, which are described by Lester as, “among the mightiest weapons of the Parties”, through their ability to control these female bodies, are shown to own them. The occlusion of the female body, and thereby their sexuality, by the Parties thus becomes a moment of metaphorical castration for Lester, in which he is denied his traditional masculinity.

In addition to the struggle over female bodies described in Cozzi’s description of the advertisements, another key moment of this type occurs later in the narrative when a woman is sacrificed to the underground train by robotic workers. I would argue that the robot’s capture and killing of the woman is described almost like a rape scene. Cozzi describes their actions, “they rapidly stripped the girl’s dress with their sexless fingers, skimmed her skin that shuddered and withdrew at the contact of those freezing claws” (Cozzi, 198). Cozzi’s description of how the robot’s operate the woman gives this scene heavy sexual undertones. This is furthered by the description of her body, “[light] staining her breast with violet lightning and lighting sensual flames on her abdomen” (Cozzi, 198). Cozzi’s choice to focus on the physical body of the female victim, emphasizes how the robot’s murder of this victim should be seen as a possessive, moreover a sexually possessive, action. Despite the overtly sexual nature of this murder, Cozzi chooses to describe the robots as, “sexless” (Cozzi, 198). In doing this, I would argue that Cozzi informs the reader that we are seeing this murder from the perspective of a human, male, voice, not that of the robots. The sexual description of the woman therefore becomes another example of how female bodies are possessed by the machine-like system of bureaucracy, and then how men are actively denied expressing their traditional masculinity through possessing female sexuality.

Overall therefore, to conclude, I would argue that Lenard in “Rainy Day Revolution No.39” represents a man that has been metaphorically castrated by the bureaucratic system he inhabits. Through the use of female bodies and sexuality in this text Cozzi repeatedly shows how the society in this imagined future controls individuals living inside it, either through physically possessing them or by controlling the most intimate details of their lives. Ultimately this reading of the text feeds into the wider conflict of individuality vs. the state present in this story.

The Origins of the “Group Mind” in SF

Throughout history human civilizations have had to contend with the problem of prioritizing the individual over the collective whole or vice versa. Most famously this ideological conflict played out during the Cold War in which the dogged individualist tendencies of the United States battled against the collectivism celebrated in the Soviet Union.

“Strengthen Working Discipline in Collective Farms”

In addition to the Communist ethos on economic collectivization, the 1930s saw the rise of racially-imagined collectivist rhetoric in Nazi Germany. Both the USSR and Nazi Germany called for the subjugation of individual whims and desires in order to better serve the “greater good” of the group. Thus the individual was reimagined as a single cog within a greater machine.

However, for many Science Fiction writers with collectivist leanings, the collectivist drive of the 30s had fallen incredibly short of their aspirations. One of, if not the first, examples of group mind came from British philosopher and SF writer, Olaf Stapledon.

Stapledon was famous for his pacifism and his left-wing thinking, becoming an advocate for the left-leaning Commonwealth Party during the Second World War. In 1930 he published “Last and First Men”, a novel in which Stapledon imagined the next 2 billion years of human existence following the 1930s. In the final chapters of his book, Stapledon imagined a perfected version of human civilization in which humans cease to have individual identities, instead forming a single group mind, allowing humanity to act in unison as a type of Super-Organism.