Living through History: Cinematography as a Testimonial

I found Mikhalkov’s documentary film Anna to be an incredibly moving and brilliant use of cinematography to encapsulate over 10 years of Russian history through a combination of Mikhalkov’s daughter’s personal accounts and references to the momentous national events during the collapse of the Soviet Union. While Mikhalkov began the project, the act of filming and producing a personal movie violated the censorship laws and put creators at danger. For Mikhalkov, a nationally renowned filmmaker, he must have known that the film and his act of political deviance could have immense impact. Anna is a creative child who is afraid of witches and wants a crocodile as a pet. She grows up to be an idealistic teenager  whose sentiments become more reflective of her environment, such as her fear of war and prediction of a “bright future” for her country where people are free to do as they want. I think that Anna’s awareness of the world around her and her faith in her country is a testament to both the human spirit and the national strength of Russia. The composition of the documentary does a beautiful job of interspersing the newsreel footage, often chaotic and violent, with the intimate conversations between Anna and her father, often amongst more peaceful countryside scenery.  This allows the audience to see a young girl grow up in a time of tumult and instability, yet still hope for a future and find a home in her country. At the end of the documentary, Anna comments that she is afraid of what will happen when she leaves Russia for Switzerland and how the country will change in her absence, yet she also says that a homeland is a place that you can believe in and you have to love. I think that the documentary serves an important historical and primary source through which to study the fall of the Soviet Union, and also a powerful testament to the stress, fear, and hope in the lives of the Russian people at this time.

3 thoughts on “Living through History: Cinematography as a Testimonial

  1. Shandiin Largo

    I agree! I would also add that Anna’s childhood is intermingled with a child’s perspective from her father’s time, as well the lives of other children present in the footage that Mikhalkov presents. This is also continued with his younger daughter, alluding to the infinite cycle of growing up, but adding specificity by focusing on this period of Russian history.
    I think your point of recognizing the montage of tender scenes and more chaotic ones adds to the uncertainty and the hyper-changing nature of this time.

  2. Ethan Hill

    I found your mention of the closely juxtaposed images of the urban and the rural to be very interesting and very relevant. I certainly agree that this was a way to show hope and uncertainty. I’d like to add that it seemed to me to be painting a picture of reckless change and growth. I noticed that the urban footage typically included enormous movements of people, implying cultural transformation with an uncomfortably fanatic sheen. There is something terribly impure about the urban, political world of the film, especially when it is placed alongside the placid, silent, and mostly empty rural world of Anna’s childhood.

Leave a Reply