Author Archives: Peter Jacobson

“seriously, the guy has a point”

I thought I would share another fascinating article that I read a few weeks back, about Fearless Girl and Charging Bull in Bowling Green Park, Lower Manhattan. The author, Greg Fallis, brings to discussion the power of symbolism and the role of commercialization in the appropriation and exploitation of meaning.

I realize this article doesn’t (directly) tie to what we’ve been talking about in class recently and might be more of a ‘class links’-type find. However, I think Fallis’ greater point––that meaning is situational––is one that certainly applies to different aspects of the Dream as we’ve looked at it.

seriously, the guy has a point

Which Way Home

I want to use this space to recommend one of my favorite documentaries of all time, which I think it really relevant to some of the themes we’ve explored in this class (particularly, the reality of the Dream, its accessibility, and the quantifications of opportunity). “Which Way Home,” filmed by Rebecca Cammisa and released in 2009, tells the other side of the immigrant story that we heard tonight: the struggles of those trying to get in. Cammisa follows the journey of Honduran, Guatemalan and Nicaraguan child migrants, some as young as eight years-old, as they leave their families behind in pursuit of opportunity in the United States. The kids follow a perilous trail, train-hopping between freight trains collectively known as “The Beast,” which run from southern Central America to the Rio Grande at the U.S.-Mexican border. For many, the journey ends badly, if not tragically. Menaced by predatory smugglers and corrupt police, children (some of whom travel alone) must contend with unpredictable weather, hunger, and the constant dangers associated with their means of travel and the life on the streets they must adapt to. To make things more tragic, some travel thousands of miles in hope of finding opportunity (in the form of well-paying work, adoption, education, a secure life in a thriving American metropolis, connection with missing family members, etc.), only to be intercepted by law enforcement agents at the border and deported back home. Give it a watch when you have the chance; it’s a must-see in my mind.

Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmLMCuatzV0

The Roaring Twenties

One of the reasons why The Great Gatsby is considered to be such a significant American historical novel, I think, is due to the dynamic time period in which it was written. The novel takes place in New York City –– the early melting pot of America –– in the thick of the “Roaring Twenties,” an age characterized by dramatic social and political change. The Roaring Twenties were years of sustained economic prosperity and a growing cultural edge in the United States. Americans were swept into an affluent but unfamiliar “consumer” society; technology in the form of automobiles, telephones, motion pictures, and radio began to play a primary role in American lifestyle; jazz music blossomed during this era; and gender roles and social classes were beginning to adapt to the changing times. Above all, the Twenties were a time of a growing “American” spirit of self-definition and novelty associated with modernity and a break from tradition. Do you think that Fitzgerald’s novel critiques or upholds the values of this time? How do his characters embody the certain attitudes present in this unique period?

Ownership and Dignity of Work

One of the themes that resurfaces often in O Pioneers!, I think, is the theme of ownership and dignity of work. The novel suggests that being devoted to one’s work and loving the work for its own merit provides a kind of dignity, a feeling of rough individuality, and a sense of purpose that one cannot really attain by other means. It is the same with the land; to Alexandra, “the people who love [the land] and understand it are the people who own it” (122). In dignified work, there is a level of mutuality and of coexistence between the land and the person toiling upon it. We begin to see a fundamental difference between struggling with the land –– a formidable, unforgiving force of nature –– and struggling against it.

Throughout the novel, though, we see other characters in Alexandra’s life who fall short of Alexandra’s simple self-determination; they fail to appreciate their work as an opportunity to make something of themselves aside from material gain, and instead turn to other satisfactory egresses, like alcohol, restless travel, or illicit love –– often meeting undignified and tragic ends. Emil and Marie, hopelessly in love, are killed by Frank who is sentenced with 10 years in prison. Meanwhile, Lou and Oscar, who are distracted by their jealousy and resentment towards Alexandra’s success and her relationship with Carl, struggle to subdue the land, and never achieve the noble stature or success of their older sister.

Alexandra’s Dreams

I thought that I would motivate a question that has been on my mind for a while now (please enlighten me, because I can’t seem to find the answers): What significance does Alexandra’s recurring dream –– “an illusion of being lifted up bodily and carried lightly by some one very strong” (80), by a god-like figure of the pastures, who smells sweetly of ripe cornfields –– have? Is it possible that these fantasies are a manifestation of Alexandra’s inner desire to be mobile, to be light and detached enough to be taken away from the land which is she so rooted to? A few months after Emil’s death, she is carried, once again, in the arm of the “mightiest of all lovers,” (112), and even sees him upon returning to her room, a mysterious figure marked by a long, white cloak, shoulders “as strong as the foundations of the world,” and a dark and gleaming arm. This time, Alexandra seems surprisingly resolved –– she comes to know, at last, “from whom it was she had waited, and where he would carry her.” A few days later, she travels to Lincoln to see Frank, the murderer of her brother, with an unusual sense of purpose and clarity. Do you think there’s a connection there?