Though discussed briefly, Beatty does talk about how blackness is measured in Dickens. His sentiment, which is as follows, “everyone in Dickens, regardless of race, was black and you determined someone’s degree of blackness not by skin color but by whether they said “For all intents and purposes” or “For all intensive purposes” (164),” is contextually based after Sheila Clark accused a white boy of stealing on her “balls.” Beatty points out the “white” boy is actually latino. This got me thinking about how race is used in the novel. As noted with Charisma, she believes she is black and must be reminded when her mom comes to town of her Mexican heritage. What does it mean to be black? What does it mean to be white? Are these constructions fluid or fixed? Can a black person be white? and a white black? Is Beatty’s comment about who is black relevant and applicable in Bowdoin’s community and on a larger scale, American society? How does this hinder us from seeing other as equally relevant?
2 thoughts on “White or Black?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I think that this is a question which is super applicable in today’s times. As different groups, races, and cultures begin to interact in ways that have never before been seen, it will either develop one of two reactions: 1) a conformity to a similar ideology or 2) a stronger tightening to former relations which may result in group grievances. Further it questions where nationality ends and race begins- is a person first American and then white/black/latino/…? Or are they white/black/latino… and then American? Where do the two identities merge and where do they diverge?
I believe this also touches on the complexity of defining Latino as a race. America’s racial issues are often presented as black white and native. I think this idea of the Mexican boy being seen as “white” and Charisma being “black” illustrates the idea of how certain latinos (although some do identify as white or black) do not often fit race categories.