Brown’s depiction of the Russian state in the field of power explains the “intrinsic aspect of Russian national culture that demands a ‘strong leader’ rather than wide participation” (165). The recurring trope of the superfluous man in much of the Russian literature we have read seems to mock this intrinsic “need” for a strong, overpowering male leader. Brown introduces the role of democracy as to “ensure and the rule of law  help to ensure that state power does not become overbearing,” but “the tight fist that has held state power in Russia since the days of Empire has left little opportunity for alternative powers to expand the field” (165).

In the texts that we have read, such as “Uncle Vanya” and “Amongst the Plants and Animals,” there is a lack of powerful male characters. This deficit is shown when male characters, who would traditionally be the strong head of the household, spend time in nature and do not prioritize their money-making or success. The trope of the “superfluous man,” who is often resented by his wife who wishes for more social status and a more lavish lifestyle, could be a quiet rebellion against the endless dictatorship in Russia. The female figure that demands a stronger husband is symbolic for the rejection of democracy and the many years under what Brown calls “the rule-making machine.”