Tag Archives: Happiness

Tolstoy: Recurrent Themes Across Master and Man and The Cossacks

A common theme I see between Master and Man and The Cossacks is that of what it means to be “truly happy”. At the end of both of these short stories, Olenin and Vasili appear to believe that a life rooted in altruism is most promising for leading a happy and fulfilling life. First, we have Vasili, a rich landowner that is predominantly concerned about buying land, and his peasant, Nikita, whom he treats poorly and often exploits. After a long and strenuous voyage together, Vasili leaves Nikita to die in the cold but ultimately returns out of a sense of duty. Vasili lies on Nikita to keep him warm and dies to save Nikita. During this Vasili exclaims, “‘I have been frightened. That is clear, and have lost my nerve’”, followed by Tolstoy’s narration: “But this weakness came not as an unpleasant sensation; rather as a notable, and hitherto unknown, delight” (525). To me, this quote explains Vasili’s newfound desire to act in service of others – this once “unknown delight” is now the very reason he sacrifices his life for another.

After his life seemingly flashes before his eyes, Vasili has passed away at last, yet is not disturbed by this; rather, he finds peace in knowing he is no longer alive. I discussed the importance of Vasili’s death in itself above but now want to move on to his “after death” thoughts and reflections, at least how Tolstoy tells it. He writes, “He remembers his money, the shop, the house, the buying and selling, the Mironovs’ millions; and he really cannot understand why that man, called Vasily Brekhunov, had troubled with all those things which he has troubled himself” (527), reminding me of how Olenin feels about his own past. He expresses boredom with his life of riches and purges himself from high society. Olenin makes an effort to leave behind the selfish life he once led to become less egocentric and find purpose in life through giving to others. Both Olenin and Vasili come to realize that the materialistic aspects of their lives are not what gives them purpose and turn to altruism to somehow reverse this. Lastly, Tolstoy writes, “…all his beings speaks joyfully and tenderly. And he feels himself free” (527). This reminded me of how Olenin finds a sense of freedom among the natural environment in the Cossacks. On a similar note, there were elements of nature in both stories that seemed similar to me. Vasili exposes himself to the natural and harsh realities of nature – the cold, wind, ice and snow – to save the life of his peasant. Olenin, too, exposes himself to his natural environment and expects that this will bring peace and happiness to his life. Vasili died in the natural elements while Olenin lived, but both were able to find some sort of inner peace through this experience.

Truth and Happiness

In The Cossacks, Tolstoy weaves the tropes of Russian exotic with the absurd in the commonplace events. While some have life-changing moment of clarity after a life-threatening event, Olenin’s moment of clarity comes after a solitary hunting trip in which his biggest danger is the mosquitos. Reveling, “But does it matter that grass will grow?…I still have to live, have to be happy. Because there is only one thing I want—happiness,” Olenin considers his purpose in the grand scheme of life and measures being a mindless element in the circle of life, content in oblivion, against a creature capable of happiness (Tolstoy, 83). And so, thanks to Uncle Eroshka’s advice and the unchangeable nature of mosquitos that makes them bite humans, Olenin discovers the route to being happy is to be his best self.

Seemingly, Olenin is rewarded for this change—he allows himself to fall in love, considers abandoning the life of lies that constitute Russian society, and take up the simpler “truer” life of the Cossack peasants, not to mention prove his masculinity by facing down the Chechens. But in actuality, Olenin deludes himself with this “truth.” Claiming his new environment for himself, “my hut, my forest, and the beautiful woman I love,” he maintains the conqueror’s mindset that if it benefits him, it is his (Tolstoy, 130). Instead of disdaining the local people for their simplicity, he disdains those at home, and yet either way he justifies his inclusion in and dominion over his new environment, his new people. But, he forgets Uncle Eroshka’s perhaps most important lesson: “No one loves us, you and me—we’re outcasts!” (Tolstoy, 118). Eroshka hits upon the most salient point in this exclamation: for different reasons, there truly is no way for Olenin and Eroshka to fit into the Cossack society, as much as they might try to relate to individual people within it. Perhaps the most frustrating obliviousness that Olenin expresses* is the idea that Maryanka loves him. Maryanka never admits any feelings whatsoever towards Olenin, save that she does not dislike him and that his hands are soft. Instead she demurs, in lieu of answers, asking questions such as, “What is there for me to tell [my father]?” or “Why should I not love you, it’s not as if you were one-eyed or a hunchback” or “Why not? If my papa gives me to you” (Tolstoy, 149-150). These questions lend a doubt to any positive feelings Olenin takes away from this encounter. Is she actually expressing the potential for love or is she indulging a slightly crazy foreigner who is providing a generous income to her family? Does she have any agency in deciding who she spends the rest of her life with or will her father (and mother) decide all for her? Olenin decides to believe whatever will bring himself the most happiness and so finds himself deluded with ideas of “truth” and grandeur that few people will actually contradict because of his status as a wealthy Russian elite.

*Frustrating for me at least, as a female reader.