Category Archives: Announcements

Tech Websites for Your Media Lit Review

NYTimes Bits Blog http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/

NYTimes Tech News http://www.nytimes.com/pages/technology/‎

Wired http://wired.com/

Slashdot http://slashdot.org/

Simply Statistics http://simplystatistics.org/

Tech Meetups in Maine http://technology.meetup.com/cities/us/me/

EnGadget http://www.engadget.com/

Digg http://digg.com

Mashable http://mashable.com

The Verge http://theverge.com

Ars Tecnnica http://arstechnica.com/

CNet http://www.cnet.com/

ZDNet http://www.zdnet.com/

Readwrite http://readwrite.com/

Digital Trends http://www.digitaltrends.com/

DtPlus http://www.dtplus.in/

Pando Daily http://pando.com/

Hacker News http://hackernews.org/

Machine Happy http://machinehappy.com/

The Next Web http://thenextweb.com/#!snAsG

Tapscape http://www.tapscape.com/

GigaOM http://gigaom.com/

Gizmodo http://gizmodo.com/

LifeHacker http://lifehacker.com

 

Announcement! Build Maine: A tactical approach to growing Maine Towns and Cities

Build Maine: A tactical approach to growing Maine Towns and Cities

November 5 – 6, 2014
Bates Mill No. 1  |  Lewiston ME

How can we build economically stronger, more successful towns and cities in Maine through strategic, high impact investments?

What if all people involved in the work of building Maine — the builders, funders, elected officials, engineers, lawyers, planners, finance institutions, and rule-makers — converged to share aspirations and best practices for moving Maine forward within the reality of the new economy?

What if we added into the mix focused conversations with nationally renowned leaders in the fields of street design, real estate development, and public service to introduce ideas on how to do more with less?

Please join us on November 5 and 6 in Lewiston, Maine for Build Maine: a tactical approach to growing Maine towns and cities.

Build Maine is hosted by the Congress for the New Urbanism’s Maine Chapter (CNU Maine) with GrowSmart Maine, the Maine Municipal Association (MMA), and the Maine Real Estate & Development Association (MEREDA).

We hope you will join the conversation.

For more information or to purchase tickets, please visit: http://buildmaine.squarespace.com/

Handout: A History of the American Grid in 4 Minutes

A History of the American Grid in 4 Minutes

January 9, 2012 by Paul Knight

Reposted from: http://www.thegreatamericangrid.com/archives/777

The grid has been used continuously throughout the world as a development pattern since Hippodamus first used it at Piraeus, Greece in the 5th century BC. A lot happened over the next 2,000 years after that, but in 1682 William Penn used the grid as the physical foundation for Philadelphia. With that, the grid began its new life in the new America. Penn’s instructions for laying out his orthogonal plan were simple:

Be sure to settle the figure of the town so as that the streets hereafter may be uniform down to the water from the country bounds…This may be ordered when I come, only let the houses built be in a line, or upon a line, as much as may be…

Penn’s use of the grid may have been influenced by Richard Newcourt’s plan for London following the fire of 1666. However, Penn may have utilized the grid for its indexical qualities. The grid by its very nature has no built-in hierarchy. What better way to promote the Quaker value of equality than to build it into the very foundation of your new town. Philadelphia was the first city to use the indexical system of numbers for north-south streets and tree names for east-west streets. Because of this coordinate system, the intersection at 12th/Walnut has no more or less social or political meaning than that at 18th/Cherry. Every plot of land is essentially equal to every other.

Over 100 years after Philadelphia, Thomas Jefferson executed the purchase of the Louisiana Territory. Following the acquisition of such a vast territory came the challenges of subdividing, selling, and occupying it. It was impossible to survey the entire area ahead of time so Jefferson devised a system that would make platting and selling achievable from a distance. Jefferson answered with the grid in the Land Ordinance of 1785. The Ordinance divided the entire western territory into townships, sections, quarter-sections, and so on. A system of Euclidean geometry made this possible. Having never stepped foot on their property, someone could point to a map, make a purchase, and start their wagon westward knowing precisely where they were going. Today, a cross-country flight will easily show the physical ramifications of Jefferson’s decision to subdivide our territory upon the grid. The vast majority of America’s western land is so arranged in logical lattice-work.

Following the precedent of Philadelphia, the grid has been used extensively in a number of American cities in every one of our now 50 states. Each of these cities, with their own purposes and reasonings, adopted the grid as their foundation with varying outcomes. In Chicago, the grid was used as a vehicle to maximize both the speed of development and financial speculation. In San Francisco, the grid flatly ignored topography and created a city of dramatic hills and valleys. In Paragonah, Utah, the grid was executed to promote the doctrine of Mormonism. But perhaps most famous of all American grids is that found in Manhattan. In 1811, the Commissioners adopted a master street plan that would come to define the city of New York centuries later. One of the greatest understatements of the 19th century was made by one of the commissioners at the time:

It is improbable that (for centuries to come) the grounds north of Harlem Flat will be covered with houses.

As we know now Manhattan did grow and it grew well beyond all expectations within only a single century. The grid was there to accommodate that growth.

In the 1920s, the roles of both the federal government and the States in the development of towns and cities were refined and codified. Amongst all of the legal changes, two documents stand out: the Standard City Planning Enabling Act (SCPEA) and the Standard State Zoning Enabling Act (SSZEA). The SSZEA specifies the creation, adoption, and use of a zoning map. The SCPEA, on the other hand, specifies the components of a municipal master plan which is made up of a zoning map and a master street plan. Unfortunately, over the last 80 years judicial interpretation over what constitutes a “master plan” has allowed the zoning map to replace the master street plan. Without a master street plan the grid is essentially impossible to execute. Thus, our American grid’s recent history has been a stagnant one.

Finally today, we find ourselves in a situation where our cities develop piece-meal on a lot-by-lot basis. Because a zoning ordinance only regulates private property and does not–and legally cannot–provide for the public framework of cities, development is rendered essentially unplanned, unwalkable, and unsustainable. A reemergence of the American grid is warranted in order to restore much needed order to the places we call home.

Book References:
The Making of Urban America, John W. Reps
Measuring America, Andro Linklater
History of Urban Form, A.E.J. Morris
The Zoning of America, Michael Wolf

Our First Round of Ideas for a Better Portland

The first round of ideas for a better Portland, Maine, gathered on September 22nd, 2014:

  • statuesque icon
  • catwalks
  • tunnel
  • connection between Back Cove and Old Port
  • green roofs
  • urban farming
  • community gardens
  • playgrounds
  • splash fountain
  • alleys
  • more-than-a-plaque plaques
  • public history
  • outdoor performances
  • outdoor performance spaces
  • dog parks
  • festivals
  • more greenery
  • recycling bins
  • less decrepit parks
  • green along waterfronts
  • more food trucks
  • food diversity
  • multi-trick city
  • more sports spaces
  • public sports spaces
  • waterfront access
  • more scenic overlooks
  • more public parking in city center / vertical garages
  • integrated local transport to nearby suburbs
  • street lamps with fire
  • seasonal attractions
  • graffiti
  • bike paths
  • signage
  • obvious transport stops
  • public maps
  • lobster drnes
  • integration
  • murals
  • public art
  • mice lighting
  • bold illumination
  • weather dependent public space
  • winter gathering spaces
  • free public wifi

Portland Research Assignments

Portland Research Assignments

DUE BY LATE OCTOBER via a series of three blog posts — see actual due dates on handout.

The City of Portland Maine, like all cities, has large sets of data about the city while other information is lacking. In the moment when big data is (sometimes) better data and while we can look to other major cities like New York City for inspiration, we need to draw on the specific place of Portland, Maine in order to make smart city recommendations that fit the place of the city. You will do this through three research assignments: a café ethnography, mental mapping, and transect walk.

  1. Café Ethnography

An ethnography is the scientific description of the customs of individual peoples and cultures, usually involving participant observations, field notes, and/or interviews. This method is considered scientific in that the data is carefully recorded and organized. For example, someone may set a timer to take detailed notes of everything they see for three minutes at intervals of ten minutes and then spend the other seven minutes continuing to walk the city, sit on a bench, etc.

The aim of the café ethnography for the class is to catch a glimpse into the everyday life of Portland, Maine from inside a local business with a view of the city’s streets. What does life in Portland, Maine feel and look like? What can be gleaned from the experience of the everyday in order to inform your recommendations for further developing the city?

In your ethnography, you will perform participant observations (you will be in a local space looking at and listening to people) and field notes (you will write down what you see). You will select a café from http://bit.ly/bowdoin-diotc-cafelist. Up to three people can sign up for the same location. You can go on your own or with the other folks who sign up for that café.

As in the example above, your participant observations should develop from what Hiss calls the simultaneous perception of the space. Choosing a place to sit with a view of the street, what do you see, smell, hear, feel, taste? Also, who is around you and what are they doing? If you look out the window from the café, what do you see on the street nearby? Keep detailed notes, recording time as you go, and getting down as much as you can on a set routine of around two minutes of notes for every ten minutes. Your ethnography should take place over a total of 2.5 hours. If you get up from your seat during that time, gather your notes and ideas while you walk or run your errand. You may wish to type your notes as you will share them in a blog post later in the semester.

 

  1. Mental Mapping

Mental mapping is the representation of an individual or group’s cognitive map; cognitive maps are the maps we carry inside our brains based on the maps we see and our experiences. This method helps to reveal someone’s personal version of a space or place. As Milgram and Jodelet demonstrate in their work on Parisians mental maps of their city, the maps are never accurate but they do reveal how residents see their city. In Lynch’s work, the imageability of a city is key to developing a thriving city.

The aim of the mental mapping exercises is to gain a glimpse into residents’ images of their city. You are tasked with gathering a total of four mental maps from four Portland residents. We will decide in class what sort of sample (length of time as resident, neighborhood of residence, variation in identifiers, etc.) you may want to include but all participants must be adults, i.e., over the age of 18. I have outlined an interview script for you. Be clear that their map will be part of a set of 100 mental maps that we will likely share on the internet—with identifying information and names removed—at the end of our study. We will also use these maps in the production of data for GIS maps.

Using 8.5”x11” pieces of white paper and then a pen or pencil, each map will likely take 10-20 minutes to draft, but watch out for those folks who get really into it and want to keep drawing and labeling—it’s up to you when to stop the interview. After they finish the map, you will need to gather their name and some background information as listed on the interview script. If they do not feel like sharing, they do not have to do so. Make sure to bring your Bowdoin ID so that you can introduce yourself as a student with identification. If they would like to know more or you run into issues or questions, you or they can reach me as the Principal Investigator at 347.742.3408 or [email protected].

It may be easiest to gather the maps while doing your café ethnography. If you decide to ask folks in a café to take part in our research, you will need to ask the owner or manager on duty if they approve of you conducting research in their place of business. Otherwise, you can always find people hanging out on the street, at another café or hangout, in a public space, or in other businesses (likely the managers and owners themselves) who want to take part.

Once you have a set of four maps, scan them in at 300dpi and keep them ready for when you will blog about them later this semester. Leave the originals in a folder marked DIOTC MENTAL MAPS in Prof. Gieseking’s box on the 2nd floor of the VAC in Martie Janeway’s office.

 

  1. Transect Walk

A less used but equally powerful method is the transect walk, the last of your three methods of data collection. Similar to Debord’s dérive, the aim is to take in the experience of the city. However, unlike a dérive, you plan out the course of your walk and you keep to one element or focus throughout the walk. For examples, someone interested in housing could look at the state of building foundations while someone interested in ICT could keep an eye for any evidence of information, communications, or telecomm.

The aim of the transect walk is to take a larger and longer walk through neighborhoods you have not yet seen to get a fuller view of the city. To that end, your transect walk must include significant time in East Bayside, the West End, or the East End. Like the ethnography, you should spend 2.5 hours on your walk with breaks as you wish. If you would like to split up the city by your research group, I encourage you to do so, and you can take a walk with another person(s) from the class, a friend, or a small group of up to four people. Your focus—locations of benches, access to good views, housing condition whether public or private—is up to you!

As you walk, take detailed notes not only of what you see in regards to your topic of interest but your experience and sense of walking the city. What do you see? Get into the details. Be sure to take photos of key sites. Record in extreme detail—hopefully by address or lon-lat via GPS if necessary—where you see these elements. These detailed accounts will inform the maps we make of the city for which you need exact locations.

IRB How-to Reminder

IRB certification is due to Prof. Gieseking by Monday at 11:59 p.m.

You need only take the Social & Behavioral Research – Basic/Refresher – Basic Course. No need to do the other modules.

How to register:

[gview file=”http://www.bowdoin.edu/academic-affairs/research/research-oversight-committee/pdf/IRB%20website_Research%20Training%20landing%20page_3-26-14.pdf”]